State v. Chickasha Milling Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is a tax ferret proceeding- from tlie county court of Grady county wherein the state, under authority of sections 12340, 12348, O. S. 1931, seeks to assess certain alleged omitted property of the defendant company in the nature of moneyed 'capital, surplus, and undivided profits as defined in section 12369, O. S. 1931, of the value of $300,000 for each of the years 1921 to 1933, both inclusive. The state and the taxpayer are referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, respectively. Demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence on each item sought to be assessed was sustained, 'and plaintiff has…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wallace Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of FairfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BurksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Funkenstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moran v. City of Del CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Evans v. Evans, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. Prairie Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State v. Stephenson-Browne Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Opinion No. (2004), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2004