Bartlesville Interurban Ry. Co. v. Quaid
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Washington County; James I. Shipman, Judge. Action by F. F. Quaid against the Bartlesville Interurban Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and •defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
McKEOWN, C.
The defendant in error, F. F. Quaid, as plaintiff below, and who, for convenience, will be called plaintiff here, brought this action against the plaintiff in error, Bartlesville Interurban Railway Company (hereinafter called defendant), for damages for negligently killing plaintiff’s horse on the 5th day of January, 1912. The issue at the trial of the cause was whether the horse came to his death by reason of the negligence of the motorman in omitting to stop said car, or apply the brakes and lessen the speed of said car, after .said horse became frightened and started…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Virginia & Truckee Railroad v. HenryNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Railroad v. Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Swaim v. SwaimIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Sanders v. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Pure Oil Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- McGuire v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SicklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Winemiller v. LortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.