Legal Opinion
Winemiller v. Lorton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1926No. 15335PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an action in tort to recover the resulting damage to plaintiff’s cattle caused by the pollution of a stream by the defendants. The appeal -is taken irom a judgment of the district court of Osage county by the plaintiffs in error, who were defendants below. Reference to the parties will hereinafter be made as they appeared in the district court.
It was alleged by plaintiff that since March, 1921, he was in possession of 680 acres of land in Osage county; that since June, 1922, he was possessed of 76 head of ’livestock, and pastured the same upon said lands; that the water supply in said…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. KezerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- International Harvester Co. of America v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Weller v. Missouri Lumber & Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bowles v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Grand River Dam Authority v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.