Legal Opinion

In Re Daniel's Omitted Property

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1924No. 13476PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLydiok, J.

The county treasurer of Tulsa county, acting upon information acquired from a tax ferret under the provisions of section 9798, Comp. Stat. 1921, served a written notice upon R. T. Daniel that on a day certain he would consider whether to assess against him personal prop-’ erty of the value stated therein as having been wrongfully omitted by the tax assessor during previous years designated. The alleged property is described therein in these words, and in these words only:

“Money, stocks, bonds, credit, deposits, certificates, oil runs, bills receivable, escrow agreements, choses in action the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. State v. KiddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Gibson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Case v. ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. In Re Assessment of Alleged Omitted Property of KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Appeal of National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Hamilton, Co. v. International Bank of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. West House, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API