Legal Opinion

Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 26, 1982No. 51059PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This is an appeal by residents near the St. Paul-Minneapolis International Airport from a district court order and judgment denying a writ of mandamus for inverse condemnation of an “avigational easement.” While we find that the trial court properly followed the procedures and the standard for this kind of proceeding, we also conclude that petitioners were deprived of a jury trial, which they had not waived, and, therefore, a new trial is necessary.

The case began in 1970 as a class action against the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) for inverse condemnation, when…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. County of Ramsey v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. City of Minneapolis v. MeldahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Zaluckyj v. Rice Creek Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Kick's Liquor Store, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API