Legal Opinion

Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 2003No. A03-616PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of both its mandamus action and its tort claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, arguing that the district court erred by determining that: (1) appellant failed to state a takings claim; (2) appellant’s mandamus action failed because appellant had an adequate remedy at law; (3) as a matter of law appellant was prohibited from pursuing mandamus and tort claims simultaneously; and (4) the statute of limitations barred appellant’s trespass, nuisance, and negligent construction, design,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Breza v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Doug Blaine v. City of Sartell, County of StearnsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API