Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of both its mandamus action and its tort claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, arguing that the district court erred by determining that: (1) appellant failed to state a takings claim; (2) appellant’s mandamus action failed because appellant had an adequate remedy at law; (3) as a matter of law appellant was prohibited from pursuing mandamus and tort claims simultaneously; and (4) the statute of limitations barred appellant’s trespass, nuisance, and negligent construction, design,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- American Family Insurance v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Breza v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Doug Blaine v. City of Sartell, County of StearnsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.