Zaluckyj v. Rice Creek Watershed District
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge. *
Appellant landowners, who contended that their land was being flooded due to overflow from a public ditch, filed a declaratory judgment complaint and a petition for writ of mandamus in district court. They sought an order requiring, in relevant part, that the watershed district remove obstructions and repair and maintain the ditch. In the alternative, they sought a writ of mandamus ordering the watershed district to commence inverse condemnation proceedings. After a court trial, the district court ruled that appellants failed to exhaust their administrative remedies,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Estate of Friedman v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Leaon v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Builders Ass'n v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Uckun v. Minnesota State Board of Medical PracticeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Johnson v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.