Legal Opinion
Kick's Liquor Store, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1998No. C7-98-1147PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge
The City of Minneapolis contends in this appeal that the trial court employed an erroneous theory of law in determining by summary judgment that the city must initiate condemnation proceedings due to the taking of access rights enjoyed by the owner of a liquor store operation located at the intersection of Broadway Avenue and McNair Avenue in the city. Because the trial court has not undertaken necessary determinations of law and fact, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Kick’s Liquor Store owns a parcel adjoining the south side of Broadway Avenue in Minneapolis but…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Vanderburgh v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Vacation of Part of Town of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- In re HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Isely v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Hardin v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Hardin v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007