Legal Opinion
Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. Fitzpatrick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 24, 1937No. 31,306PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
The Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District appeals from an order denying its motion for new trial.
The problem of sewage treatment and disposal in the cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis has been a matter of public concern over a period of years. The legislature, recognizing the necessity of concerted action by the two cities to correct or at least alleviate existing evils caused by lack of suitable and modern facilities to meet such conditions, enacted L. 1927, c. 181, creating the Metropolitan Drainage Commission. Amongst other things that commission was empowered…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Wilson v. SorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Connor v. Township of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. GreenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Pueblo v. García Chavez del ValleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.