Legal Opinion
Augeri v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 26, 1991No. 8869PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The parties previously appeared before this court in Augeri v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 18 Conn. App. 722, 560 A.2d 985 (1989). That case determined that the plaintiffs motion to open should not have been denied and the case was remanded to the trial court to consider whether the trial court originally should have dismissed the appeal from the planning and zoning commission (commission) for the plaintiffs failure to attach the sheriffs return to the appeal documents. On remand, the trial court found that the plaintiffs appeal should not have been dismissed. Thereafter, the trial court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. TokConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Kobyluck v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. KindrickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.