Legal Opinion

State v. Gilnite

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 24, 1987No. 12859PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNovack, J.

The defendant, Maureen Gilnite, was convicted upon a plea of nolo contendere of being a persistent larceny offender. She appealed to the Appellate Court claiming, inter alia, that the trial court had erred in denying her motion to dismiss this charge. The Appellate Court held that she had waived her right to appeal the trial court’s determination by pleading nolo contendere. Upon the granting of certification, the defendant appealed and now claims that the Appellate Court erred in deciding, sua sponte, that she had waived her right to appeal by pleading nolo contendere, because she had…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API