Legal Opinion
Simko v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 1, 1987No. 13193PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The plaintiffs, Jeannette S. Simko and Valerie Varga, filed this appeal from a judgment of the trial court, Meadow, J., dismissing their administrative appeal from a decision of the zoning board of appeals *414of the town of Fairfield (hereinafter the board). The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the appeal for the plaintiffs’ failure to name the clerk of the municipality in the appeal citation. We find no error.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. On August 1, 1986, the board granted a variance, subject to certain conditions, to the defendant Roy Henry Ervin,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Norwich Land Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.