Legal Opinion

State v. Kindrick

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 19, 1993No. 11286PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a).1 *57The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) precluded evidence of prior sexual conduct of the victim, and (2) failed to rule on reopening the evidence to hear new evidence.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. The defendant, a sailor stationed at the submarine base in Groton, met the victim in early August, 1991. They had two dates and, on the evening of August 30, 1991, went on a double date with another couple.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RinaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. HoeplingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Augeri v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  5. State v. ButlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. SieringConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. State v. HarrisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. State v. ManiniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API