Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Holmes
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 3, 1993No. 11424PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants1 after a trial to the court. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that he had failed to satisfy his burden *318of proving the existence of a joint venture between his father and himself, (2) permitted his former attorney to testify as a witness for the defendants in violation of the attorney-client privilege, and (3) denied his motion to open and set aside its ruling regarding the propriety of the attorney testifying. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Each of the issues raised by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hennessey v. HennesseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Cruz v. DrezekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. HoeplingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Alix v. LeechConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Dime Savings Bank v. CornagliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. RosedomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Kirei v. HadleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.