Legal Opinion
Kobyluck v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 27, 2004No. AC 24100PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The intervenors1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court modifying the special permit issued to the plaintiffs, Daniel W. Kobyluck, Maureen A. Kobyluck and Kobyluck Sand & Gravel, Inc. (collec*162tively Kobyluck), by the defendant planning and zoning commission of the town of Montville (commission).2 The intervenors claim that the court (1) improperly invalidated several conditions attached to the special permit3 and (2) was required to remand the matter to the commission after invalidating those conditions. In addition, the commission cross appeals, claiming that the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Irwin v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- R.C. Equity Group, LLC v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Gevers v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Sobczak v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Prenderville v. SinclairConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Dickerson v. PincusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.