Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 14, 1999No. 98SC243PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
We granted certiorari to determine whether the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act, sections 10-4-701 to 726, 3 C.R.S. (1997), requires that a self-insured automobile rental agency provide coverage to a driver who was not authorized by the rental agency but was allowed to drive by the lessee. We review the court of appeal’s ruling that a driver of a rental car who was unauthorized under the terms of the rental agreement did not have legal permission to drive the car for the purposes of insurance coverage. See Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. v. Hertz, 967 P.2d 175, 176 (Colo.App.1998). The court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Ewing v. Colorado Farm Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- McConnell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of IllinoisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Mid-century Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Brucha v. Cruise America, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001