Legal Opinion

Long v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1987No. 168PA87PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

The issue is whether the pain that must accompany an injury resulting in a hernia to render the injury compensable under N.C. G.S. § 97-2(18)(c) must occur simultaneously with the sustaining of the injury. We answer in the negative.

The Hearing Commissioner made, and the full Industrial Commission adopted, the following findings of fact:

1. On or about January 22, 1985, plaintiff, a 27 year-old single male with a high school education and service in the United States Army, had been employed as a strapper in the defendant’s packing department for approximately five years.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Walker v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Saunders v. Edenton Ob/Gyn CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Creel v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Roach v. Lupoli Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Pernell v. Piedmont CircuitsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API