Long v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Justice.
The issue is whether the pain that must accompany an injury resulting in a hernia to render the injury compensable under N.C. G.S. § 97-2(18)(c) must occur simultaneously with the sustaining of the injury. We answer in the negative.
The Hearing Commissioner made, and the full Industrial Commission adopted, the following findings of fact:
1. On or about January 22, 1985, plaintiff, a 27 year-old single male with a high school education and service in the United States Army, had been employed as a strapper in the defendant’s packing department for approximately five years.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Walker v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Saunders v. Edenton Ob/Gyn CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Creel v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Roach v. Lupoli Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Pernell v. Piedmont CircuitsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.