Legal Opinion

Hansel v. Sherman Textiles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 107PublishedCited by 244 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, review by the Supreme Court after a determination by the Court of Appeals, is to determine whether there is error of law in the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Even though the record in the case before us may support a finding that plaintiff did not contract an occupational disease as a result of exposure to cotton dust in her employment with the defendant, if, upon review, this Court finds that the decision of the full commission in its opinion and award is supported by competent evidence, we must conclude that there is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by244 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Wilder v. Amatex Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. McAninch v. Buncombe County SchoolsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Peagler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API