Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.
There are no exceptions by any of the parties to the findings of fact by the Deputy Commissioner and they are final and conclusive. G.S. 97-86. Winslow v. Carolina Conference Association, 211 N.C. 571, 582, 191 S.E. 403. Claimant’s exception to the judgment below raises the question: Do the facts found support the judgment? Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 658, 80 S.E. 2d 762; Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 537, 539, 35 S.E. 2d 609. So our inquiry is whether the findings of fact support the legal conclusion that employee’s claim for additional compensation is barred by G.S. 97-47 and the award…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Tucker v. LowdermilkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Hanks v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Winslow v. . Carolina Conference AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Perez v. American Airlines/AMR Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Lewis v. Craven Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.