Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-Operative
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The crucial question presented by the exceptions is: Does the evidence suffice to show that plaintiff, in the course of his employment, sustained a compensable hernia?
Defendants’ exceptions necessitate a review of the evidence. We do so in conformity with the well-settled rule that findings of fact made by the Commission are, when supported by any evidence, conclusive on appeal. Plaintiff is entitled to urge, in support of the findings, every reasonable inference which can be drawn from the testimony; but when all the evidence and the inferences to be drawn therefrom result in only one…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Smith v. Cabarrus Creamery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Richards v. Town of ValdeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Fish v. Steelcase, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Adams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.