Legal Opinion

Creel v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 2002No. COA01-1058PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

The issue presented by this case is whether, pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) may be held liable under the Tort Claims Act for the alleged negligent acts of licensed foster parents. The Industrial Commission answered the question in the negative. We affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Burnest and Rita Gamble are licensed foster parents. Justin Michael Creel (“the child”) was placed by the state with the Gambles on 21 October 1996. On 17 March 1997, while under the foster care of the Gambles,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Gammons v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Griffith v. Glen Wood Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Wilkerson v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Creel v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCESSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Wnc Holdings, LLC v. Alliance Bank & Trust Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2012
  5. Bunch v. N.C. D.O.C.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API