Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1930PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.

Two questions of law are presented by the record:

1. Was the plaintiff an independent contractor and therefore not entitled to compensation?

2. Was the employment “both casual and not in the course of the trade, business, profession or occupation of his employer?”

Upon the facts appearing in the record, the first question of law must be answered in the negative. “An independent contractor has been defined as one who exercises an independent employment, contracts to do a piece of work according to his own judgment and methods and without being subject to bis employer except as to tbe results of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eddington v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Greer v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Hoffer Bros. v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  4. Pfister v. Doon Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. F. C. Gross & Bros. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Gupton v. Builders TransportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API