Legal Opinion

Pernell v. Piedmont Circuits

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1991No. 9010IC1316PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiff-employee was a 46 year old man who had experienced recurrent incisional hernias prior to and during his employment with defendant Piedmont Circuits. The initial hernia was diagnosed and repaired in 1978. This initial hernia site required five subsequent surgical repairs between 1978 and 1987. Plaintiff-employee’s previous hernia was diagnosed in October 1987.

On 5 April 1988, plaintiff-employee fell while performing a job related task. Plaintiff-employee felt his hernia site “bust loose” immediately after his fall. Two days later, he felt a “bulge in his stomach.” Eight…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Mayo v. City of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Moore v. Engineering & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Long v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. American National Can Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Bondurant v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. McAllister v. Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Chambers v. Transit ManagementCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Billings v. Ladd Furniture, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API