Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. C. Mouser, J. De La Motte, and Andrews & Wright, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
On this appeal from the judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of the intervener, no brief is filed and no oral, argument made on behalf of the intervener. The appellant moved for a judgment upon the ground that no brief had been filed, which motion was denied. The case was regularly set for hearing in this court. No appearance was made on behalf of the intervener. The matter is now submitted for decision upon the brief of the appellant and the typewritten transcript, prepared under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Appellant seeks a reversal upon the merits, without an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kelly v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bullock v. BullockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by15 opinions
- Caminetti v. Imperial Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Culjak v. Better Built Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Richards v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hammond v. HazardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Dell v. HjorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.