Legal Opinion
Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 7, 1986No. 85 Civ. 4669 (RLC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound Lines”) moves for sanctions against Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. (“Fuji”) pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Civ.P.1 This motion follows the court’s order of May 2, 1986, granting summary judgment to Greyhound Lines.2 The court found that Fuji, plaintiff in that action, had failed to establish any basis for liability on the part of Greyhound Lines. Greyhound Lines now alleges that the complaint and the amended complaint fell short of the standards mandated by Rule 11.
BACKGROUND
This case arose out of damage allegedly done to a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel v. AronoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse v. Belk Bros. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio v. Insurance Corp. of IrelandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Friedlander v. BarnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gutierrez v. City of HialeahDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
- Tall v. Town of CortlandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Televideo Systems, Inc. v. MayerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Healey v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.