Legal Opinion

Friedlander v. Barnes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 21, 1985No. 84 Civ. 533 (RLC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

On September 20, 1984, the court, in an opinion with which familiarity is assumed, conditionally granted plaintiff’s motion for class certification in this private action claiming violations of federal securities laws. 1 Friedlander v. Barnes, 104 F.R.D. 417 (S.D.N.Y.1984). The class as certified includes all persons who sold defendant Dorchester Gas Corporation’s (“Dorchester”) stock between November 15,1984 and November 30, 1984, inclusive. Defendants Dorchester and its senior management— defendants John Barnes, Preston Peak and George Rooker (“the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API