Legal Opinion
Tall v. Town of Cortlandt
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 16, 1989No. 87 Civ. 7773 (RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants the Town of Cortlandt (the “Town”), the Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt (the “Town Board”), the Town Attorney of the Town of Cortlandt (the “Town Attorney”), the Town Clerk of the Town of Cortlandt (the “Town Clerk”), Charles G. DiGiacomo, Jack E. Gaffney, Michael E. Mongero, Frank B. Cernese, Raymond R. Romash (collectively the “Town Board”), Gerald Klein and Harriet L. Boyle (collectively, the “Town defendants”) have moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. dismissing the complaint of Robert Tall (“Robert”) and Aram Tall (“Aram”)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vialez v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- East Coast Novelty Co., Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Sudarsky v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Celli v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Carroll v. RagagliaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.