Legal Opinion
Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel v. Aronoff
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 18, 1986No. 85 Civ. 1647 (RLC)PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel (“Kramer Levin”), a Manhattan law firm, brings this diversity action 1 to recover $110,507.86 for legal services it allegedly rendered to Arnold Y. Aronoff (“Aronoff”) and the JDL Trust (the “Trust”). This matter is now before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, F.R. Civ.P., on all of Kramer Levin’s claims and on all of Aronoff’s affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Plaintiff also moves to strike the answer and counterclaim filed by Aronoff’s attorneys…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- News World Communications, Inc. v. ThompsenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- IMG FRAGRANCE BRANDS, LLC v. Houbigant, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.