Legal Opinion
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse v. Belk Bros. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 16, 1985No. 82 Civ. 3458(LBS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAND, District Judge.
OPINION
Plaintiff, Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse (“Burlington”) brought this action in May 1982 against the defendants Belk Brothers Company and Belk Stores Buying Service, Inc. (sometimes hereinafter referred to jointly as “The Belk defendants”), Jantzen, Inc. (“Jantzen”) and White Stag Manufacturing Company (“White Stag”). Burlington seeks damages based upon alleged violations of the federal antitrust law. Plaintiff alleges that defendants engaged in conduct constituting per se violations of section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, by forming…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Gagliardi v. Ted McWilliams Joseph Fugere, Lawrence Jones, Joseph Layden, Thomas Ogg, Sondra Sullivan, Bernard Dravis, Elverda J. DawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Sorisio v. Lenox, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Gouveia v. Pulley (In Re Pulley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- Perry v. International Transport Workers' FederationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.