Legal Opinion

Miller v. Modern Motor Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1930No. Docket No. 4071PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This is an action brought to recover possession of an automobile, or, in the event delivery cannot be had, to recover judgment for the value thereof. Judgment went for plaintiff, to the effect that upon payment by plaintiff of the entire balance due on the purchase price of the automobile, delivery be made to plaintiff. If delivery could not be had, then plaintiff should have judgment in the sum of $1612.63. This appeal is prosecuted from the judgment.

It is first contended that the complaint does not state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action, in that waiver is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Loftis v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Giannini v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Erskine v. UphamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API