Legal Opinion
Erskine v. Upham
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1942No. Civ. 13606PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Appeal is by defendant in intervention Chester R. Upham (also the defendant), from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in intervention Richard William Clark for the unpaid balance on an agreement to pay for an assignment of certain contracts and accounts.
Clark (the intervener) had been employed by one George Snider who was in the neon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sonnicksen v. SonnicksenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Zimmer v. GorelnikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Siemon v. Mortgage Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Mercer Casualty Co. v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kyne v. EusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Potrero Homes v. Western Orbis Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- County of Santa Clara v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Snidow v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Salazar v. MatejcekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.