Giannini v. Wilson
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINN, Justice.
The appellant sued in replevin, claiming the right to the immediate possession of an automobile in 'the hands of the appellee. The right to such immediate possession was predicated upon an alleged breach and default in the terms of a conditional sale contract made on Nov. 30, 1936, between appellee and the Robinson Motor Company, which contract was thereafter assigned to the C. I. T. Corp. and later assigned to the appellant.
The appellee did not put up a forthcoming bond. He answered, denying the allegations of the complaint and cross-complained for damages claiming a wrongful…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Louisville & I. R. v. SchuesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- C.I.T. Corporation v. GlennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Miller v. Modern Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ShedoudyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- J.R. Hale Contracting Co. v. United New Mexico BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Gregory v. PadillaAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- First National Bank v. Southwest Yacht & Marine Supply Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Hoff v. LesterWashington Supreme Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.