Legal Opinion

Hoppin v. Munsey

California Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1921No. L. A. No. 6615PublishedCited by 46 opinions

The faets are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action by the assignee of a vendee to recover money paid by his assignor to the vendor upon a contract of sale of real estate, including certain taxes paid on the land. The defendant had judgment in the court below, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The contract of sale was made between Munsey, the defendant, and one F. W. Abbott, assignor of plaintiff as aforesaid. The complaint alleges that on September 14, 1914, Munsey and Abbott executed an agreement whereby Munsey agreed to sell to Abbott certain real estate for one thousand six hundred dollars, payable as follows: $250 in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Monson v. BragdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API