Legal Opinion

Conner v. Butler

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1931No. Docket No. 4184PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE THOMPSON (R. L.) Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants which was entered upon the rendering of a verdict in an action based upon a promissory note. The plaintiffs sued for $37,383. The answer denied defendants’ liability on the ground that .the note was procured by means of fraud. A cross-complaint was filed demanding $85,000 damages as a result of the fraud. A verdict was rendered against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendants on their cross-complaint for the sum of $38,000. Judgment was entered accordingly. Upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Jackson v. MeinhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Stumpf v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Denson v. PresseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Holcomb v. Long Beach Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API