Conner v. Butler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE THOMPSON (R. L.) Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants which was entered upon the rendering of a verdict in an action based upon a promissory note. The plaintiffs sued for $37,383. The answer denied defendants’ liability on the ground that .the note was procured by means of fraud. A cross-complaint was filed demanding $85,000 damages as a result of the fraud. A verdict was rendered against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendants on their cross-complaint for the sum of $38,000. Judgment was entered accordingly. Upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Jackson v. MeinhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Stumpf v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Denson v. PresseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Holcomb v. Long Beach Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.