Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Meinhardt
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1929No. Docket No. 3772PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This is an appeal from a judgment against plaintiffs for failure to amend a pleading after a general demurrer had been sustained to a third amended complaint. The suit was for fraud exercised in procuring a contract for the sale of a lot in Los Angeles, California.
The amended complaint to which a general demurrer was sustained with leave to amend, set up an action for damages based upon fraudulent representations regarding the location and boundaries of a lot which the assignors of plaintiffs were thereby induced to purchase.
The complaint alleged in substance that on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Lynch v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- National Reserve Co. of America v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Schied v. Bodinson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Staley v. McClurkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Denson v. PresseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.