Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
In an action to enforce payment of a promissory note, defendants appeal from a money judgment rendered upon a directed verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff.
The fundamental issue presented is whether the court erred in not permitting certain defenses based on fraud to be tried by the jury. Other questions raised are (1) the propriety of the dismissal of defendants’ cross-complaints at the time of trial without affording leave to amend, and (2) whether parol evidence is admissible to show an agreement between the payee of the note and a guarantor thereof, by which the former promised not…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- George v. TateSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. PendergrassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Horn v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Rankin v. Frebank Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Apolito v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.