Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Long Beach Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1933No. Docket No. 4724PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

The respondents recovered judgment for damages in accordance with the verdict of a jury for fraud exercised by the appellants in an exchange of properties. It is conceded there is a conflict of evidence respecting the proof of fraud. The appellants seek a reversal of the judgment on the grounds of alleged error in the reception and exclusion of evidence at the trial, and in the giving and refusing of instructions to the jury. The appellants also contend the- conduct of the respondents subsequent to the discovery of the alleged misrepresentations accomplished a waiver of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Mulford v. EstudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Schied v. Bodinson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Channell v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Hartong v. Partake, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. M. G. Chamberlain & Co. v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API