Legal Opinion
Denson v. Pressey
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1936No. Civ. 10437PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYork, Acting P. J.
The plaintiffs recovered judgment in the sum of $15,000 in an action for damages as result of alleged fraud in the sale of stock made to plaintiffs by defendants. There were a number of representations alleged, and although some of them may not be classed as actionable, there is no doubt, in view of the verdict of the jury on conflicting evidence, that there was proved by credible evidence misrepresentations of an actionable nature sufficient to legally anchor the verdict and the judgment thereon.
Plaintiffs alleged that on May 9 and July 10, 1928, they purchased, in two several blocks of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. LazardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance Co. v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.