Legal Opinion
Stumpf v. Lawrence
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1935No. Civ. 5266PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
A joint and several judgment was rendered against the defendants for fraud alleged to have been exercised in procuring the exchange of properties situated in Los Angeles County. The defendants Lawrence and Myles, only, have appealed.
The plaintiffs owned three tracts of land in Santa Monica and Pasadena, of the total value of approximately $33,000, subject to mortgages aggregating the sum of $14,400. The defendant Lillian B. F'ergie owned the Melba Apartment House in Santa Monica, together with the furniture and equipment thereof, represented by her agents to be worth $35,000. The Melba…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Jackson v. Deauville Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Cruess v. FesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Holcomb v. Long Beach Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Lewis v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Kahn v. LischnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Clar v. Board of Trade of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Crawford v. NastosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Willson v. Municipal Bond Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.