Legal Opinion
Amax Fly Ash Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 16, 1975No. 261-69PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam: This case comes before the court on defendant’s exceptions to a recommended decision filed by Trial Judge Hal D. Cooper on May 23, 1974, pursuant to Buie 134(h), having been submitted to the court on oral argument and the briefs of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. It is, therefore, concluded that claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 3,421,587 is valid and infringed and that plaintiff is entitled to recover…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., Federal Pharmacal, Inc., Seymour N. Blackman, Steven Blackman, John Blackman v. Richard D. Wood, C. Harvey Bradley, Jr., Earl B. Herr, Jr., Cornelius W. Pettinga, Eugene L. Step and Arthur R. Whale, Additional on the CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Deichmann v. Boeing Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.