Legal Opinion

Morgan v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 15, 2008No. 07-205CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) (Def.’s Mot., docket entry 17), filed June 30, 2006, seeking dismissal of plaintiffs claim for compensation for “time solely spent driving a government vehicle between home and work.” On July 31, 2008, plaintiff filed a response to the motion (PL’s Response, docket entry 19), to which defendant filed a reply on August 14, 2008 (Def.’s Reply, docket entry 20). For the reasons discussed below,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crusan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Stocum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Hamilton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Wolfen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API