Boyer v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
The court has before it defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, relying on Rule 12(e) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). This motion has been fully briefed. Oral argument was held on November 14, 2008. For the reasons described below, defendant’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The twenty-two plaintiffs in this case worked as Marine Enforcement Officers (MEOs), occupational series 1801, grades GS 9 through GS 12, for the United States Customs Service and/or its successor agency, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crusan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Stocum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hamilton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010