Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 31, 2008No. 06-680 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Dismissing the Claims Remaining to be Adjudicated (“motion”).1 In this action, defendant seeks a judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) dismissing plaintiffs claim for compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000), for time spent driving a government vehicle between home and work. Plaintiff contends that judgment on the pleadings is inappropriate and has requested oral argument…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crusan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Curtin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Jaster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009