Legal Opinion
Crusan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 24, 2009No. Nos. 07-434C, 08-44CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Before the court are the defendant’s motions for partial judgment on the pleadings in the two above-captioned cases. The defendant brought its motions in both cases pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The defendant seeks to dismiss that part of each of the plaintiffs’ claims for compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000), for time spent commuting between home and work in government-owned vehicles (hereafter, the “driving time” claims). Plaintiffs in the two…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tigerswan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Curtin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Filipczyk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Jacintoport International LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.