Legal Opinion

Wolfen v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 24, 2008No. 03-2665 CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

The court has before it defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, relying on Rule 12(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). This motion has been fully briefed. Oral argument was held on November 14, 2008. For the reasons described below, defendant’s motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

The plaintiff in this case worked as a telecommunications specialist, occupational series 391, for the United States Secret Service. PL’s Opp. at 1; Def.’s Mot. at 2. Like many federal law enforcement officer-plaintiffs pursuing overtime pay claims in indirectly…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crusan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Fitch v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API