Legal Opinion

Golden West Credit & Adjustment Co. v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1932No. Docket No. 4404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiff began this action against Verne S. Wilson and George D. Karsch, individually, and as copartners doing business under the name of Wilson & Karsch, to recover on an assigned claim for goods, wares and merchandise sold to the defendants while doing business as copartners under the firm name and style of Wilson & Karsch.

The complaint, so far as this appeal is concerned, is based upon the count set out herein, wherein it is alleged that the plaintiff’s assignor sold to the defendants, goods, wares and merchandise in the sum of $1996.23. Judgment went in favor of the plaintiff as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Richardson Drug Co. v. DunaganColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Rogers v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Upper San Joaquin Irrigating Canal Co. v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Multi Media Zone, Inc. v. Star E Media Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API