Stapran v. James H. Maden, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of an automobile and to recover payment on purchase price, by reason of an alleged breach of implied warranty. It is alleged in the complaint that the automobile was purchased from both of the de fendants, but on trial the plaintiff proceeded on the theory that the car was sold by the Tarola Motor Car Company through its agent, the defendant James H. Maden, Inc.
The Tarola Motor Car Company in its answer denied that it sold the car to the plaintiff and alleged affirmatively that there was an independent sale by the defendant James H.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Curran v. HollandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Fullerton v. McLaughlinNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Luke v. GriggsSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1886
- Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. C De BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. WhiteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019