Legal Opinion

Second National Bank v. Wheeler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1889PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J). Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff declared upon the following instrument as a promissory note, viz.:

*547*‘$150. Bichhond, Ind., July 22, 1886.

“On or before the first day of November, 1887, the subscribers, of Alamo post-office, Kalamazoo county, State of Michigan, jointly and severally promise to pay the incorporated company of Gaar, Scott & Oo., or order, one hundred and fifty dollars, payable at Kalamazoo National Bank, with 7 per cent, interest from date, and 8 per cent, after due, and -5 per cent, attorney’s fees, without relief from homestead valuation or appraisement laws, for value received.
“The makers and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cayuga County National Bank v. PurdyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Story v. LambMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Altman v. RittershoferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. First National Bank v. CarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Altman v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Savage v. Peterson Distributing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City National Bank v. Gunter Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Hegeler v. ComstockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Oyler v. McMurrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API