Legal Opinion

Cayuga County National Bank v. Purdy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1885PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Branch. (Pealer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The only question to be determined in this case is whether the instrument offered in evidence is a negotiable promissory note. It reads as follows :

“ $366.66. Coldwater, Mich., February 27,1883.

On the 1st day of November, 1883, we, the undersigned, whose postoffice address is Algansee, county of Branch, and State of Mich., jointly and severally, for value received, promise to pay E. M. Birdsall & Company, or order, three *7hundred sixty-six 66-100 dollars, with interest at 7 per cent, per annum, if paid when due ; if not so paid, then the interest shall be 10 per cent, per annum from date. We…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. CrossthwaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Brooke v. StruthersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. First National Bank v. LaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Randolph v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API