Legal Opinion

Altman v. Fowler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit on a “ Paisley-shawl Note.” Plaintiffs bring error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChampeen, J.

The declaration in this case is upon the-common counts in assumpsit, and added thereto is a notice-as follows:

“To THE ABOVE-NAMED DEPENDANT:
“ Take notice that, on the trial of the above cause, the plaintiffs, under the money counts, will give in evidence a certain promissory note, copy of which is given below.”

This notice was signed by the plaintiffs’ attorneys. The-note reads as follows:

“$180. Manistee, Mich., Oct. 6, 1885.
“Six months after date I promise to pay to the order of *59M. Cohn one hundred and thirty dollars at the First National Bank of Manistee, Mich., for value received, without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Stubly v. BeachboardMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Altman v. RittershoferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Second National Bank v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hegeler v. ComstockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Walker v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hart-Parr Co. v. Krizan MalerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Wright v. TraverMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API