Legal Opinion
Altman v. Fowler
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit on a “ Paisley-shawl Note.” Plaintiffs bring error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChampeen, J.
The declaration in this case is upon the-common counts in assumpsit, and added thereto is a notice-as follows:
“To THE ABOVE-NAMED DEPENDANT:
“ Take notice that, on the trial of the above cause, the plaintiffs, under the money counts, will give in evidence a certain promissory note, copy of which is given below.”
This notice was signed by the plaintiffs’ attorneys. The-note reads as follows:
“$180. Manistee, Mich., Oct. 6, 1885.
“Six months after date I promise to pay to the order of *59M. Cohn one hundred and thirty dollars at the First National Bank of Manistee, Mich., for value received, without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Stubly v. BeachboardMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Altman v. RittershoferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by14 opinions
- Second National Bank v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Hegeler v. ComstockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Walker v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Hart-Parr Co. v. Krizan MalerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Wright v. TraverMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.